WACV Oral 2025
PETALface
Adapt a strong face-recognition model to degraded images by training small quality-dependent adapters instead of the entire backbone.
Co-author
Gallery and probe
How it works
Quality-weighted adapters
PETALface keeps the recognition backbone frozen and trains two LoRA branches, using only 0.48% of the parameters. An image-quality estimate weights their contributions for each input.
Adapting across image quality
Quality-dependent weighting addresses the mismatch between clear gallery images and degraded probes while retaining the pretrained representation. The reported BRIAR comparison uses Swin-B, WebFace4M and Protocol 3.1.
Quality-weighted adapters
Results
The adapters improve face verification compared with the pretrained model and full fine-tuning in this test. TAR is the proportion of genuine matches accepted at a fixed false-accept rate.
| Adaptation | BRIAR TAR at FAR 0.1% |
|---|---|
| Pretrained | 45.93% |
| Full fine-tuning | 29.68% |
| PETALface | 55.35% |
WACV 2025, Table 2. Swin-B, WebFace4M, BRIAR Protocol 3.1.
Higher TAR is better. Only 0.48% of parameters are trained by PETALface.
The comparison uses BRIAR Protocol 3.1 and differs from the FG 2025 BRIAR study. Full fine-tuning reaches 29.68% under this protocol.